All affidavits provided to the Court for review must be filed with the Clerk of Court. Defense counsel must also provide a copy to the State but need not do so before the Court considers the affidavit. If the prosecutor indicates intention to proceed in this manner, defense counsel may also file and provide the Court a working copy of an affidavit in opposition to the State’s request, provided the defense counsel has informed the Court in the presence of opposing counsel, that defense counsel wishes to do so. The prosecutor must also provide a copy to the defense but need not do so before the Court considers the request. State prosecutors seeking bench warrants for failure to appear may forego the hearing by presenting the Court with an affidavit setting out the facts the prosecutor believes support the issuance of a bench warrant together with proposed findings and a proposed warrant authorization for the Court’s consideration in chambers, provided the prosecutor has informed the Court on the record, in the presence of opposing counsel, that the prosecutor wishes to do so. The Zoom meeting information and instructions are included below. This calendar will be held remotely via Zoom to limit the number of participants in the courtroom. Unless previously addressed during another calendar, this calendar shall include all matters from that week, including those on the trial call calendar that morning, in which the State is requesting a bench warrant or the Court, on its own motion, is considering the authorization and issuance of a bench warrant. If Friday is a Court Holiday, this calendar shall take place at 1pm on the last court day of that week. Additionally, any party seeking to overcome the presumption above may seek to do so by properly noting and filing a motion before the assigned Judge asking the Court to find good cause to overcome the presumption.Įffective December 11, 2020, there shall be a Warrant Authorization Calendar every Friday at 1pm. Notwithstanding the presumptions above, any Judge scheduled to hear the matter may determine there is good cause to overcome the presumption. Sentencings that require that a defendant be taken into custody shall be done in person only. Sentencings on all violent felony offenses unless both parties agree it can be heard remotely and the assigned Judge concludes it is appropriate to have the matter heard remotely.Sentencings for felony cases where a victim is expected to be present in person.There shall be a presumption that the following matters will require an in court personal appearance: Sentencing hearings for misdemeanors, gross misdemeanors, and non-violent felony matters where a victim is not expected to address the court, unless the victim also wishes to appear by video conference and/or agreement of the parties.Motions Call Calendar Friday afternoons.Extended Criminal Motions as approved by the judicial officer hearing the calendar.Motions anticipated to last less than 10 minutes. If the state is requesting a no contact order at arraignment, the prosecutor shall provide the order to defense counsel with sufficient time to obtain the signature Arraignments, except those where the state is requesting that a no contact order be entered, unless the defendant has previously signed the no contact order and it is available for the Judge’s signature at the time of arraignment.ZOOM PROTOCOLS AND PROCEDURES FOR CRIMINAL HEARINGS, EXTENDED CRIMINAL MOTIONSĮffective October 26, 2020, there is a presumption that the following proceedings may be heard remotely through Zoom proceedings:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |